Title: Deconstruction Theory
Subject: From Structuralism to Poststructuralism 116-128
Date: 19,04,24
<aside> 💡 Key Points:
Write it after the class
</aside>
<aside> ✏️ Notes:
Main lecture notes
Binary oppositions
Deconstruction
Post-Truth
Truth or truth
Being or being- var olan - Varlık
Nature vs Human mind
Reality vs Truth
Objective reality
God is dead, which contributed to the absolescence of objective reality and of the autonomous scholar who seeks to discover ultimate reality.
There is no correct reading.
Derrida
There is no ultimate reality
For post modernists all that is left is difference.
There exists no center, nor one all encompassing objective reality, but as many realities as there are people.
Each person’s interpretation of reality of reality will necessarily be different. No one has a claim to absolute truth; therefore, tolerance of each other’s points of view becomes the postmodern maxim.
No such thing as objective reality exist; there is no ultimate truth because truth is perspectival, depending on the community and social group in which live. Since many truths exist we must learn to accept each other’s ideas concerning truth and we must learn to live side by side in a pluralistic society, learning from each other while celebrating our differences.
Logocentrism means based on rationality
Superiority of human reasoning
If its rational it is superior
God-Man
Man-Woman
Postmodernism’s core characteristics can be stated as follows;
Good-Bad
Mind-Body
Conceptual things are eternal
Aristotalion either/or Logic
Reason is the authority
Phonocentrism
Priviliged vs unpriviliged
Writing- Speech : Speech is unpriviliged so it is superior
Structure of the text based on binary oppositions

Good without bad can not be imaginable
There is no evil because the evil is the absense of good
God can not exist without Devil
Final için 4 veya 3 soru 2 tanesi cevaplanacak Kavramlar önemli* koyu yazılmış chapterlar
The Road not Taken
Discuss Russian formalism Form and New criticism
The Road not Taken
Iambic meter not strict
Transcendental signifier
Freud and Jung Decentring the individual and introducing ambiguity and fragmentation, modernism began to see life as a collage rather than a map.
Write it during the class
</aside>
<aside> 📎 Summary:
A brief summary and conclusion about the notes/lecture
Jacques Derrida, a key figure in poststructuralist thought, proposed a radical critique of structuralism through the technique of deconstruction123. His work challenges the assumption that systems are self-sufficient structures and questions the possibility of the precise definitions on which systems of knowledge must be based2.
In Derrida’s view, poststructuralism is not a final “after” in the sense of a hurdle now passed. Instead, the “post” means “with but also different”. Deconstruction is still structuralism, but opened up and transformed1. This transformation takes place through an undermining of structuralism’s most fundamental claims to absolute truths1.
Derrida’s deconstruction of Husserl’s phenomenology and of nature and essence in structuralist theories of language, extends into the work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau1. Poststructuralism must be thought of as deconstruction, and not the opposite1.
As for modernity’s understanding of reality, it is often defined as a condition of social existence that is significantly different from all past forms of human experience45. Modernity is the belief in the freedom of the human being and in the human capacity to reason, combined with the intelligibility of the world, that is, amenability to human reason4.
One of the most prominent and lasting achievements of modernism in all its manifestations is the devaluation of the premise that we occupy an ‘objective’ reality, accessible to but independent of human perception6. In this sense of liberation, the modernist model for reality becomes the field (as in scientific field models), where observers are also participants6.
Modern Objectivity:
Postmodern Subjectivity:
The mimetic theory of language is a concept that suggests language originated from our ability to mimic, or imitate, the world around us12. This theory is rooted in the idea that humans have a natural propensity for mimesis, which is an embodied, analogue, and primordial mode of representation12.
According to this theory, mimesis is a preadaptation for language and also a self-sufficient cognitive adaptation in its own right, which accounts for some of the major features of human cultural and cognitive life1. It includes three behavioral manifestations: rehearsal of skill, re-enactive mime, and non-linguistic gesture1.
These mimetic acts are observable by others, making them a potential basis for a culturally accepted “mimetic” vernacular1. This enables members of a group to share knowledge, feelings, customs, skills, and goals, and to create group displays of emotions and intentions that are conventional and deliberate1.
While these types of shared representations may seem limited compared to language, they constitute a powerful means of creating culture and sharing custom, feeling, and intent1. This theory provides a unique perspective on the origins and development of language, emphasizing the role of imitation and embodied representation12.
Write it after the class
</aside>