· There’s a blockage of history (historical cul-de-sac or impasse).

· Man is mired, in the mass, in the machine, in the city, in his loss of faith, in the hopelessness of a life without intention or terminal value.

· Teleological (the ides that the universe has been made to fit a particular design or purpose, i.e. God’s) ends and secular progress are questioned.

· There’s disparagement of culture; the mind is an enemy of vital human powers.

· Bourgeois proprieties and self-containment of culture are challenged.

· Modernist writers discard the formal procedures of their Romantic predecessors. They feel that tradition is a nuisance, even a tyranny, to be shaken off; and they question the Romantic faith in transcendence through individual ego or its pantheistic merger with a god-filled universe. They also deny its idea of militant liberalism.

· Modernists embrace the avant-garde, extreme self-consciousness, prophetic inclination, and the stigmata of alienation. The avant-garde scorns notions of “responsibility” toward the audience and notions of aesthetic assumptions. The audience may or may not exist, they even ask whether it should exist. Modernism proclaims its faith in self-sufficiency.

· The modern writer presents dilemmas, not answers or endings.

· Nature ceases to be a central subject or symbol.

· Dominant motif is perversity—surprise, excitement, shock, terror, affront.